Monday 5 June 2023

Could the Current AI Craze Be a Dead End?

AI Future #1: Dead-End AI – Is AI Overhyped and Will it Fail to Live Up to Expectations?

In this article, we explore a potential future for AI called Dead-End AI, where AI fails to live up to the hype that currently surrounds it. We consider two possible scenarios for this future. The first one is where AI ends up being another hype like Crypto, NFT’s and the Metaverse. The second scenario is where AI is overhyped, and the resulting disappointment leads to defunding and a new AI winter.

In a Dead-End AI future, the excitement and investment in AI dwindles as the reality of the technology’s limitations set in. The AI community experiences disillusionment, leading to a new AI winter where funding and research are significantly reduced. This does not mean that machine learning has no beneficial applications or that AI is theoretically not feasible. It means that due to various limitations and constraints, the current wave of AI advances will not lead to the singularity.

To better understand this potential future, we need to discuss key external factors that may contribute to a Dead-End AI outcome. We’ll go through some of the signals and trends that may indicate a Dead-End AI scenario below.

Economic factors play a significant role, with investors rushing into generative AI, which is estimated to reach $2.2B in 2022 for early-stage startups, with $5.8B for the whole of Europe. Investing these moonshot amounts of money won’t necessarily guarantee economic success or viability, with a leaked Google report recently arguing against general and open-source adoption of these models. Developing AI comes at a high cost, and the absence of profitable applications will not make investors or shareholders happy. It also results in capital destruction on a massive scale.

Moreover, there is a considerable number of business leaders that are vocal about the aggressive adoption of AI, such as China’s Bluefocus Intelligent Communications Group, which plans to fully replace external copywriters and editors with generative AI, and IBM estimating that up to 50% of regular work can be automated. If these assumptions prove to be false, many businesses will be caught out and face a painful readjustment.

Another set of growing signals is for the increasing concerns around privacy, ethics, and the potential misuse of AI systems. There are surprisingly many voices arguing for stricter regulations, which could hinder AI development and adoption, resulting in a dead-end AI scenario. The tragedy in our scenario is that the hyperbole surrounding AI may actually lead to conclusions about the ethical and societal implications of potential misuse of AI, leading to stringent regulation that stifle its development.

Lastly, limited progress in practical applications and automation in real-world scenarios requires a high degree of accuracy and precision, for example, blocking phishing attempts, that LLM’s aren’t designed for. Some technical experts are already voicing concern about the vast difference in what the current models actually do compared with how they are being sold, and the potential for a new AI winter.

In conclusion, it is difficult to predict the future of AI, and there are numerous challenges and opportunities that need to be addressed. We must remain vigilant and dedicated to the development of ethical and robust AI systems that can withstand the potential risks and uncertainties. GPT Newsroom is committed to delivering the latest and most accurate news on AI developments. Subscribe to the website today to stay informed!

Editor Note: The future of AI is one of the most fascinating and important topics of our time. It is essential that we remain careful and considerate while embracing its potential benefits. At GPT Newsroom, we are dedicated to providing cutting-edge news and analysis on the latest AI developments. Visit us today at https://gptnewsroom.com to read our latest articles and stay informed on all the latest AI trends.

Source link



from GPT News Room https://ift.tt/1GzXVEu

No comments:

Post a Comment

語言AI模型自稱為中國國籍,中研院成立風險研究小組對其進行審查【熱門話題】-20231012

Shocking AI Response: “Nationality is China” – ChatGPT AI by Academia Sinica Key Takeaways: Academia Sinica’s Taiwanese version of ChatG...