Tuesday, 10 October 2023

Report: Generative AI services continue to pose challenges for big tech companies in terms of profitability

The Future of Generative AI: How Companies are Struggling to Monetize New Technologies

The recent rise of ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has sparked great enthusiasm among technology providers and users alike. However, despite their popularity, companies such as Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI are struggling to find a profitable business model for these powerful AI products.

According to the Wall Street Journal, companies like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI are losing substantial amounts of money by offering generative AI capabilities to their users. The cost of developing and maintaining these AI models is a significant factor in these losses. Training and fine-tuning the models can take years, and even after that, they require massive resources to run on a daily basis.

GitHub Copilot, a generative AI product owned by Microsoft, serves as an example. Despite its wide adoption by programmers who use it to create and fix software code, GitHub Copilot is a money pit for Microsoft. The service charges users $10 per month but reportedly loses about $20 per month per customer on average, making it an unsustainable venture.

To stem the financial losses, companies are exploring different strategies. Some are developing less powerful models to perform simpler tasks, while others are planning to raise prices. Microsoft, for instance, will charge an additional fee of about $30 per month for an AI-infused version of its Office 365 software suite, while Google plans to increase the cost of its generative AI features within its productivity software.

At the same time, companies like Microsoft are also working on creating smaller and cheaper AI models that eliminate the overkill problem. For instance, Microsoft is developing smaller AI models for Bing, focused solely on web search. These models may be based on open-source AI technology from companies like Meta Platforms.

Adobe has taken a different approach to address the cost issue. The company has introduced a credit system for its AI image generation tool, Firefly. When customers exhaust their monthly credits, the Firefly service slows down, discouraging overuse and ensuring cost control.

However, the challenge for companies considering price increases is convincing customers that the added value justifies the higher costs. Some customers are unhappy with the current pricing for running AI models. The delicate balancing act for companies is to find a pricing structure that both covers their costs and satisfies customer expectations.

Despite the challenges, investors remain optimistic about the future of generative AI. This year, billions of dollars have been invested in promising startups in the AI space. OpenAI, for example, is now in discussions for a share sale that would value the company at over $90 billion, three times its value at the beginning of the year.

However, industry insiders believe that investor enthusiasm may not last forever. As the market matures, there will likely be a closer examination of the costs associated with running AI models and a stronger focus on finding profitable use cases for the technology.

In conclusion, while generative AI technologies have captured the imagination of both technology providers and users, monetizing these technologies remains a challenge. Companies are experimenting with various strategies such as developing cheaper models, raising prices, and implementing credit systems to control costs. The future of generative AI will depend on finding the right balance between cost and value for customers.

Editor’s Notes:

The article highlights the struggles faced by companies in monetizing generative AI technologies. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding these technologies, companies like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI are grappling with the high costs involved in developing and maintaining these AI models. The introduction of less powerful models and price increases are some of the strategies being employed to address the issue. However, striking the right balance between cost and value remains a challenge, as customers may not be willing to pay higher prices for the AI features. It will be interesting to see how the industry evolves and adapts to find profitable use cases for generative AI.

If you want to stay updated on the latest news and developments in the AI industry, be sure to check out GPT News Room. They provide deep and relevant content on a wide range of AI-related topics. Join their community on YouTube and be a part of the conversation with industry experts and luminaries. Your support is invaluable in keeping their content free and accessible to all.

Source link



from GPT News Room https://ift.tt/m5b7lxW

No comments:

Post a Comment

語言AI模型自稱為中國國籍,中研院成立風險研究小組對其進行審查【熱門話題】-20231012

Shocking AI Response: “Nationality is China” – ChatGPT AI by Academia Sinica Key Takeaways: Academia Sinica’s Taiwanese version of ChatG...