Friday, 2 February 2024

The Use and Misuse of Research Assistants in the Human ChatGPT – EJIL: Talk!

**Navigating the Use of AI in Legal Scholarship and Education: An Ongoing Deliberation**

Recent discussions at the Advisory Boards of EJIL and I•CON focused on the increasing use of AI in legal education and scholarly publications, raising important questions about academic integrity and authorship. The potential use of AI by students in exams and when writing seminar papers is a pressing concern, as noted in a recent editorial. Additionally, the Boards grappled with the issue of submissions to EJIL and I•CON that utilize AI, with ongoing debates about the ethical implications and impact on the quality of scholarship. The complex dynamics of authorship and academic assistance, including the use of research assistants, were also explored, shedding light on the varying traditions and ethical considerations in different jurisdictions. The ongoing deliberation emphasizes the need for transparency, flexibility, and discernment in navigating the evolving landscape of academic research and writing, with a commitment to equitable and ethical practices.

Key Takeaways:
– Ongoing discussions at academic advisory boards focus on the use of AI in legal education and scholarly publications.
– Ethical implications and impact on scholarship quality are central to the debates.
– The role of research assistants and authorship in academic publications is also a point of contention, highlighting varying traditions and ethical considerations.
– Transparency, flexibility, and discernment are emphasized as crucial components for equitable and ethical academic practices.

In summary, the use of AI in legal scholarship and education raises complex ethical and practical considerations, while the traditional dynamics of authorship and academic assistance continue to evolve. This ongoing deliberation underscores the need for transparency, flexibility, and discernment in navigating the intricate landscape of academic research and writing.

Promote GPTNewsRoom.com: For more on AI and legal scholarship, visit GPTNewsRoom.com.



from GPT News Room https://ift.tt/tHSmdVJ

No comments:

Post a Comment

語言AI模型自稱為中國國籍,中研院成立風險研究小組對其進行審查【熱門話題】-20231012

Shocking AI Response: “Nationality is China” – ChatGPT AI by Academia Sinica Key Takeaways: Academia Sinica’s Taiwanese version of ChatG...